BEE Partner, South Africa Economy Watch

Learning programmes

The indicator specifies skills development spent on learning programmes. What constitutes a learning programme? If the money is not spent on a learning programme as defined, the measured entity may not include the expense in measuring skills development contributions. Statement 401 defines a learning programme as, “any of the learning programme types described in the Learning Programme Matrix“.

The Learning Programme Matrix is provided as Annexure 400A of Statement 400. It provides a broad spectrum of training that it considers a learning programme. Any of the following may be included as measurable for QSE contributions to skills development: Read the rest of this entry »

Having established how much the business needs to spend, the next step is to consider what to spend the money on so it will count as contributions to transformation. This section provides guidance on what the company may and may not include as skills development spend. The term “skills development spend” is defined, meaning that unless the spend meets the definition, it will not be included in the measurement. Read the rest of this entry »

Calculations of BEE Skills Development

The calculations of skills development spend includes expenditure on learning programmes and in-service training programmes. The following calculation assumes the indicator is subject to adjusted recognition for gender.

Measurement of the skills development spend indicator

The calculation of the adjusted recognition for gender is as follows:

A = B/C + C

A = the adjusted recognition for gender

B = the skills development spend on Black employees divided by the leviable amount

C = the skills development spend on Black women employees divided by the leviable amount Read the rest of this entry »

The skills development levy was designed to force entities to invest in skills development by paying money to a SETA. This money is recoverable from that SETA when the company invests in skills development. A large majority interpreted the skills development levy as a pure tax, paid the money to the SETA and never reclaimed it. This approach results in zero return and becomes, as mentioned, a straight tax.

The objective of BEE is to stimulate growth, not to invoke taxes. If the skills development initiative is not going to result in a return for the business then it is likely to result in unsubstantial skills training. If it is unsubstantial, then the trainee is not going to be any closer to participating in the mainstream economy and the exercise lacks substance. Strictly speaking, BEE contributions that lack substance are not measurable.

An investment implies that the employee will return from training with the ability to make more money for the company than prior to the training. Whether that training entails operating a computer programme more efficiently or part-time study for a university degree is particular to each business. But it must result in a return for the company greater than the initial investment. Read the rest of this entry »

Qualifying socio-economic development contributions

Socio-economic development contributions consist of monetary or non-monetary contributions actually initiated and implemented in favour of beneficiaries by a measured entity with the specific objective of facilitating sustainable access to the economy for those beneficiaries.

The contributions may be monetary based or non-monetary, such as providing training or sacrificing their employees‘ time in favour of beneficiary groups, as opposed to incurring a direct expense. The contribution must be “actually initiated and implemented“, meaning it must be exercised and paid for. Future initiatives do not count. Read the rest of this entry »