The skills development levy was designed to force entities to invest in skills development by paying money to a SETA. This money is recoverable from that SETA when the company invests in skills development. A large majority interpreted the skills development levy as a pure tax, paid the money to the SETA and never reclaimed it. This approach results in zero return and becomes, as mentioned, a straight tax.
The objective of BEE is to stimulate growth, not to invoke taxes. If the skills development initiative is not going to result in a return for the business then it is likely to result in unsubstantial skills training. If it is unsubstantial, then the trainee is not going to be any closer to participating in the mainstream economy and the exercise lacks substance. Strictly speaking, BEE contributions that lack substance are not measurable.
An investment implies that the employee will return from training with the ability to make more money for the company than prior to the training. Whether that training entails operating a computer programme more efficiently or part-time study for a university degree is particular to each business. But it must result in a return for the company greater than the initial investment. Read the rest of this entry »
